Whether a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was violated when the State's primary eyewitness to the exchange testified under a false name, which was not disclosed to the defense prior to trial

No question identified. : |. Whethor a deferdont's ane pvetess _ MigltS_ owe viclated) when the Sietels _ peimary “eyeviitness to the erhenge tesihes unter a fice name, which Was not disclosed to the defirse viv Set ober dval. Counsel of Revordl: Janie Qjong justice, Com (Dickey, Campbel\ bed Salrag Law Fem, PLC),