No. 20-5926
Rolando Candia v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-2119 18-usc-924(c)(3)(A) carjacking carjacking-statute crime-of-violence elements-clause federal-criminal-law intimidation sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal carjacking statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2119, qualifies as a 'crime of violence' under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the federal carjacking statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2119, which may be violated by means of “intimidation” through threats of mental or non-corporeal harm, categorically qualifies as a “crime of violence” under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A). i
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 5, 2020)
Attorneys
Rolando Candia
Todd M. Borden — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Todd M. Borden — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent