Whether the Michigan courts violated the petitioner's state and federal constitutional right to due process of law

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ais michigon Low ” allowing for a defercluis Slate an fecleral Corshitinal Goarontee fo Ave Poocess oF Low to be volated by clehvering erraneous ery jastruchiens ; Beng We 75.12 prosecutors Porluwe to Proowee witness -{astrvctien™ | Based OFF oF People ur Heret, 4o4 7 Dd was We State Cund Nelerel Const bubional talc to due process of Law Violated when lle Suge gave an improper Cure Legevrling A MiSsINZ Witney? Bios He petrtoners Shale carck Feder! Const Heat rigid to olee Process Yrolated because of ProKC10 ro inyscorchuct * UH ore Michigan Coucts Usolatney x clefrdlais Slate aro} Feclercl Consttotional Cab to dlue process of Low becuusé of Cconfrentaliona! ~ and Compulsory Viglations wher We Covels ose Placing He berclen . 2 lo produce a tutness Upon On incevceratécl oleLerd ont ?(Hus 1 lait oF In Orquararts ((Qvestors)) 4 ord § when re Porter b produce tw tne was Ia of Meter He Orosector or te olefose wel oinceol Lon om incoveeroted dleFercont-) 5 did eerse Counsel, Oa trick Ocennell, Make Sepous mistakes Which Predy rluced He pebitioner by Puslovey to Grotec clePasd out -petctoner Concerns Procedural Qrotection wluch deprived dle deLencut— © Gplbener “OF OF tewnale hkely Cane of AacaviHo) © | lo did chefese Covnsel, patrick Oconnell, tail te be Orepared For a tachreal clef nse tutuel Cowsed a breale clown of dhe adversarial process bebween tle oleferse arch Qrosaction Tes} Lime Wa NVielabeon oe Peblones State ur Pecteral Constetoteng| Riobet | lo effect ue A5siGuce OF Counsel ¢ The Cel teaw Cnswes Yes to all @vestions presented ,