Robert B. Wister v. Donald R. White, et al.
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Denial of due process and equal protection in elder abuse case
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Abject refusal of a series of courts to read and give credibility to Appellant’s brief citing violations of statutes by those holding office. County Attorney refused to enforce statutes and instituted barratry. ARTICLE XIV... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. Overturn Federal and State laws protecting seniors from abuse in form of: legal; economic; psychological; property; physical. Rendering null Federal Statute Public Act 111 148 ... TITLE VI Subtitle H—ELDER JUSTICE ACT et. seq. ARTICLE I Section 8 (18). BOR ARTICLE VIII ..., nor cruel and unusual punishment be inflicted. The above actions forming political assassination, under color of authority, for Appellant’s advocacy of California Constitutional Article XIII. This is now ongoing for 42 years. Federal Courts ignored plea for injunctive protection from this process. Trial by jury was also denied at all levels). BOR ARTICLE I: ... petition the Government for a redress of grievances. ARTICLE VII. Right of Trial by Jury. Initial false charge was $305. Lost check was $440.82. CFR 42-3058; CFR 28 §1343(a)(3); CFR 21-CIVIL RIGHTS SUBCHAPTER IGENERALLY on vo