Is the imposing of a sentence which was based on incorrectly scored sentencing guidelines and was a departure from applicable advisory guidelines where the sentence violates the principle of proportionality as set forth by People v Milbourn, 435 Mich. 630, 461 N.W.2d 1 (1990) and is unreasonable in violation of People v Lockridge, a violation of due process pursuant to the U.S. Const. Ams. V, XIV; Mich. Const. 1963, Art. 1, §17?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Is The Imposing Of A Sentence Which Was Based On Incorrectly Scored Sentencing Guidelines And Was A Departure From Applicable Advisory Guidelines Where The Sentence Violates The Principle Of Proportionality As Set Forth By People v Milbourn, 435 Mich. 630, 461 N.W.2d 1 (1990) And Is Unreasonable In Violation Of People v Lockridge, A Violation Of Due Process Pursuant To The U.S. Const. Ams. V, XIV; Mich. Const. 1963, Art. 1, §17? Thereby Entitling The Petitioner To Re. Sentencing. Pursuant To U.S Const., Ams., ‘ V, VI, XIV; Mich. Const. 1963, Art. 1, § 17 Sg toe i . ; ; '