Whether subsequent act evidence of additional threats is admissible in an 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B) prosecution for threatening a federal judge when the government proves its case by playing a clear and unambiguous recording of the charged threat

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether, in an 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B) prosecution for threatening a federal judge, subsequent act evidence of additional threats made months after the charged conduct is inadmissible when the government proves its case as to the charged threat by playing a clear and unambiguous recording of the communication at issue? Prefix