Does the Trial Court's Order to dismiss a Writ of Habeas Corpus petition violate the petitioner's constitutional rights?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 43 . Pe Noes i4 Shonul « iblation oS dive . pts Aceon dene te he 00S. Conch € ub Pow 5 ach PUP PRY ES ihe ei Slow, tae is\ au Liew ig ‘a ¥ Ane. ciy cumqj : : stuiaces that eras \ ahebity. to yetula rettet fag. dhe a ’ i a uf + s al Curt us tp Selibfoner’s Sing ye intayrcerok Mi? & Seo, Fupthteus lives pape -{ 4G) j Res. #1 =~ G \ eee if 5 Oud leds t i at Ye Foy inse ram / Sevan Sea ph Esvd ay pri a ‘wiry white Sin sak Faun. aw cay fia fae Sregar ihe BC aywesed Inch) . : fo_syison in |iew oF gwnvel ia ‘tb Sudd Ovngrusn . Preane A coact % tis PASE 2 eS He ) 52 Cc. « §9 > 3 d oo A BRR : it a. Oo z G y # Tg ; fo Secs. B45 8, 201) Ao Wom gece, Bo, § Moy sh 2K ; ; Sees, = ‘ 2 : eee 5. 4 a : es yttinana _Moes_the Trial Court's Opler te disealss_wffrega, 5 Welt oF Hobheas Cores » Parle Revoeat) on oFbey losi, zg \ Soh FG = 4 & 4s. no__Subyzet iuliery Auvighick fan Signal a wlolakiny oe US. Coastituttonal pYbves eth wiley Ve 2ST oO avah iy Ye SNe yy soe aE é ‘fo fiedlil on redysss oF gicle. womees awl egaat sndectimn ume Moe Lau: reipectclo . : i ie. Doss i+ Sityaud Mant kot k apace ite awk Oouatia bus _ a kionul ZY ree whew & he Pads e wpe’ Sis, Ped caval, Endl ane Four of A 2B es ie Santer Pottibion TF. TranS¥ey uw Appeal on ‘Liew eF all aforomenttoned Quethlons Prewaed in Con~unckion with ( See Sortarenten. pas. tt 4~ &}D a e eye 4 . : ° a Y '¢@ ; ' wl Seq Aoandx DO: verisred PRephy und Motion Ts Devagy ppei eels Motton ‘Te OPS mise pp.) Sees. BO07 fy #3, Ses-e Bland 3h, ie Ca} NCCF#414 (Rev. 06/03/19 (02:13:04 PM)