No. 20-5951
Joshua Scott Richards v. United States
Tags: child-pornography criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing federal-sentencing sentencing sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness u.s.-sentencing-commission u.s.s.g.-§-2g2.2
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a sentence imposed pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines covering the crimes of accessing or possessing child pornography, U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2, is substantively unreasonable due to flaws in those guidelines?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a sentence imposed pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines covering the crimes of accessing or possessing child pornography, U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2, is substantively unreasonable due to flaws in those guidelines? i
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Joshua Richards
John Carl Arceci — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
John Carl Arceci — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent