Whether the Sixth Circuit's property applied the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) in denying Petition relief where in the underlying state court matter, the prosecution violated Cope's due process rights as provided for under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) by failing to disclose that a victim-witness at his criminal trial had served as confidential informant for the police.

Whether the Sixth Circuit's property applied the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) in denying Petition relief where in the underlying state court matter, the prosecution violated Cope's due process rights as provided for under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) by failing to disclose that a victimwitness at his criminal trial had served as confidential informant for the police