No. 20-5968
Rochelle Driessen v. Miami-Dade County, Florida, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts appellate-review certiorari civil-procedure court-access due-process florida-constitution judicial-procedure jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court of Florida denied petitioner access to the court pursuant Article 1, Section 21 of the Florida Constitution when it declined to accept certiorari jurisdiction of the petitioner's appeal
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : QUESTION (S) PRESENTED WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DENIED PETITIONER ACCESS TO THE COURT PURSUANT ARTICLE 1, SECTION 21 OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION WHEN IT DECLINED TO ACCEPT CERTIORARI JURISDICTION OF THE PETITIONER’S APPEAL
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-10-26
Waiver of right of respondent The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida to respond filed.
2020-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 9, 2020)
Attorneys
The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida