No. 20-5971
Gregory D. Crosby v. Bill True, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process equal-protection jurisdiction legal-procedure petition-for-writ remedies standing statutory-provisions
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-court-erred-in-dismissing-the-petitioner's-claims
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4 7 . » “Dab (| oateRess | 92. OS Sa nete i Nten? A_Odisoneh EANAcar NWSI Nee Romedtes QD . DON P\Cee Clerk oO po RiScl ined ; C Mell no iv\ —Caarr+ DS Saas Seth Vloaemas fe | D Game BhrA PPgedmns ted tam Rohe lO NSSG
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent Bill True, Warden to respond filed.
2020-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Bill True, Warden
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Gregory D. Crosby
Gregory D. Crosby — Petitioner