Whether a court can acquire subject matter jurisdiction over a criminal charge when the warrant used to search a smartphone is invalid because the affidavit contains false information

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4) Dees a covet acquire Subjeat matter jprisdictiou ever 4 cocina ) charge WA io areaigeind pee remit fee (a <tie andichuaat docsmat (on wes op) ee han 74 ‘he ww raked Doe trocesa Fabsee Cause. ts “le. aurt clerK < | Byars a searck warract Tee a smart PHONE i vali when (SWta warract contains a Le about ~Yhe. Source af he levice ir peaily cautradkats al( pobee festimanies auch Get \tt s 26 waustes BE PORE The tase ¥ c arged Crm alee aM volving “fhe suact PHONE yaud (<%4) The wacrauct is depuire © hundreds a sts electranic reeards © *) videuce. advissille. when St is reautted) as 7 copy Ts oe Disc. “4 alleged Voice. yaai( a a -swartPieNe Lew -fwoe (Z)rdepers tt acoustic frevsic experts cont fy teat ; <fla ‘cop Us a fier? conpatonized Dectally =analgamated ass rahe? at (Pay Keusteied” mises fi breated by oncentigred Oc . ‘ > 7 aud ‘aok ASN perce ayers o | Lf) Ts wrtiess. tectwerey, admissible who (a) at is rested Ly 1064 af ALL. profeuioual wodieal Cecords aud expest testsaun (A) St is fon mentally pecs wil 4 O.2. BAC phate af au alleged qucidect, Git) ts on Tecord! te have beeu altered ou | adteZZ days af Saat wiliass “s Arconsnited huaucial “tufts 4 charged pacsis assets youd (wyYeo Pine aASES HF cousecsve outs & reg re ardiug~these ee adhe tral judge, corcedtea at “Wfhese. 32 pernprtca LOOT Y 4 tmpedchmeut 7 4