Whether the Wisconsin Court of Appeals erred in affirming the conviction of the petitioner despite the state's failure to prove the essential element of the charged offense

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a we DMN BL WAS GEN SMH NH cwedY Solo decd Bah . SM te Or nanirnad Ryo Stadion Sov Ate Stina offense lees ~ EXSUA WAS SRD OY eond Condtaiviioons’ WOW) ue See EXE Sovy AWAa\ Gord KRReE\ % No SRY ony Snusariny TDid AG Sede OF WISCONSIN UWolsde. Ration ds Food A-Amarin S'S Bos Ao QVOo) held: OC AOMEDN SEENON Cond SDE ~ = . wan LG Wamu Gdeanrans Solely URE \husa Say Wfowmedian Gyros ANCESTORS Redden Ualho \nee \ncad cutiousudd hha of Ske State OCR ere USAR Mae SOD AeARddY Goss Wok Baily oF oY q dovy TF ot eat ne ; SANE ASSEN Wve, Busey pay ok Wu Rrcdaiel Shade cond Rd SSeS WACK SeQove Xo resents cand Grinhonge Rw (sso of Me wets BNAEAAY OF AL Greed An Se SAND O& roe Garantie WaSov mrdcdown F. Tid lod Sa \ Wisconsin Coury Of ARRES ey SORE GOR Antigua eh chostad Wo Rise hon Wri BAM BON WD WS. ed, Sommnmen V4 ASE Ais MUL SAAS RRO; SRB: Re RESET yo Wen SO S ne Mie Shek OF UEEEONS OD Of VAs \povdken ob Reec® 4S Rvove Axa AR CRERAON UXBoBEsS WAS Tarods Lo Que AMA WE, OS COS, \piyoundts SHEEN Ae koto’ 7% qpouy Mae DOM Corr) es SSOALSY GorStick® caands Les > Kontera) So Sedwred oso Usredatiancds \oY Suse ©SSRO CNS Sond dua Stedare\ GMI Keokd Roscoe ko LH VS 3B ws4W z pra Nose Les eic Goer Ste Ass Mequon wmdsoy VBOSS3B VTUSH Led Loy ard CCEEERAANS RK SRE GaVkS Kinin Wwe Soot . Rewrts core Wy ASK 7 ; ARRLEK, eS ROSNown Sov BOWEN ND Sa DGONE WRUGHE ERVERST een : eRWreEsd wy Mae Kanai OF Bue (SdOUd Bs Raditiovess WAS —s . aes Rn SSO TAROT RARAne, RY ORES SRO Ro Wu Stone K ALEASED URN Due RORRESOT \ncnioyy Noe WpreQesds Sara RY SO Or aoe car UXNERED SRE Velo con® \resiony ase eebsceec eS enh ~ —kAonn WR SO Se Bede of ALSO, EH Oe Restore ~ ae a SX mar Ao med own XW YY Duo sinr Dok oR Gender BWC, ee Beene a Nes .