Whether mandatory life sentences, natural or de facto, for juveniles are unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment regardless of whether the trial court complies with Miller v. Louisiana

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED, i DE FACTO LIFE SENTENCES FOR Swvenstle Halley A ee ain SoAsE ARE DIS fhoPORTIONATE AKD VIOLATE THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, UNLESS THE TRIAL CouRT ob _ CONSIDERS YOUTH AND LTS ATTENDANT CHARACTERISTICS. | Dee MILER V-ALABAMA AnD Mor/TGnHeRy ViLOUSTANA | CUMETeD Staves VT) Z: WHETHER A ChteGoat cal Baw oxi MANDATORY Litre Sevewuces, NATURAL OR DE FACTO Foe Su VINZLES SHOULD BE DhifeseD oo . Because THEY Ake WCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER THE EZG4{ITH } | | LHODHENT ReGMODLESS 15 Te TRIAL Coutr CoMPLLES WITH | MINER -C WNLTIED STp7ES CONSTLTVTLony, AnendMent XC) : TST OFPARTIES : fai parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of , all