Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions

No question identified. : ag 9% i) Fa 29 pus7s Ape yr AVYInt ghar eg VASA Y G) 2. 0 ~“ . | Vial rf pty $$07 0 arg GLU ogres of sey ®@ Puy rey" woe G17”. : ‘mesnand ) ag w2bitd 10 0Y$ “yaw Xa sg00 PV Lv 0s47 Po al 219 7y hy i7y * Va (3) gorv7 eu SLY by FuLeqaiA hia mm 2 bay puma f ant 61 ayeV LL PLALS pref) poowla = 250 ; , . : oy y (1 fe) pa by Boyne bh pagan 412% 7797 pred’ . ” y 03 nae 25 Jay ener AL7]050F 204Y raga! ” o ee 7500. © | weg BUSY 2704Y ye2ida@ 7] “aes : | 1 Lae. | cawtf, 255) @ ot Lali {7 0. QOL ug LIULS poboye 23v7 LY o% J ep omooy nb ve awyp zy reed W7P @ 41d fo. aan hy wird Y yPauw ue fr""g , : raarneda YA PO? ep 2h 77HEVO ry an cal ov mw PYHls rst Pod poosd S g QL p50 Beata le K~ 4 thvePR4aUu ste Aneg IVY hywrolug yey pray Aylererrouy saws WATS A py Anag eau ‘papwh ty MND Farry YUVAL Mak dt pws GT i ' GB.LN3S3dd (S)NOILSaNOD Sroysorp 4? joNa , 'Sa9T 7! L5r0bay GALL] arp iA pvud sbuynd Wd Ge ne pez?o7 Pyd ey ued KL r0eD WIL 204Y PP? 1S md Ay 22¢2nb 7? aby M7. gf sy of @ Larraqry FO70[NU4 A ACT WII urges Gvbrvyly 40h10 PAS? mare PRlTt. Pua — — mpergp-youa al 2ovazeg d bvisyy Pwd 9vte79 TY