No. 20-5997
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 administrative-exhaustion administrative-remedies compassionate-release criminal-justice exhaustion federal-procedure judicial-review sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred by ruling that exhaustion of administrative remedies is required before a court can consider a motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the district court erred by ruling that exhaustion of administrative remedies is required before a court can consider a motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). i
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2020)
Attorneys
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Zaira Franco
Jacinta Hall — Office of the Federal Defender, Petitioner