Whether a defendant is required, in light of well-established facts, to explicitly plead constitutional conditions and treatment in prison on the plea record to have a viable claim of an 'involuntary plea' due to 'unkept promises' when the government subjects the defendant to extreme and unusually outrageous conditions and punishment in a maliciously concealed manner

Questions PresenteD Totrodvetion f Question fhesented: Petitioner havine, been subjected ts extreme, arsdl Osblagedd, pRi son vomeltionS aud “ctuel and causual Pon Shwent™ that VS tontamouast Ay dactu he, maveck ty vacate her yedsement &¢ ConVicdoass STEMMIRG Flom a plea arytceuienh, due to “unkept plawiseS She Algued that the cevews mets hag made an imtp ech plomise ts phovide het wih corstiftioval douditiows . and tnreabuert, dutliny, he Sertence ; cohen it ercteed toto heft plea ayeement. The. lower courttden ect dhe . Mohan Ow dhe Sfoucds tact: ra) cawvictedl MutdefeCs “Conca aud safely “ dould ust be allovect te ouhweigh the weed fo hal the mutdeket “accountable, anc that sincehe petitioner “files ty place the. Phomise 45 constitutional Conditons, ancl treatment, Ld PhiSan> ad Nayseom on the plea fecatd thete was No urikept Pom: SEB" inudlved. LTS a defendant Requited , in [ight f well-established (acs, to axlicitel eke. a Phar Se L dan stdutional Aonditions, and treatment iw P(KScm an the plea Recatd; 4) have a viable ; alain to* \avalurttaty plea’ due to “unkept PRonises hen the geveeue rt subjects the clefendaat -b extreme Land onosually Outtayesus Ganditiens , aad uni shtent, is a Malic ioasly Cancecleds Mannet } .