No. 20-6001

Antranette Canady v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 3583(d)(2) civil-rights criminal-procedure liberty-deprivation probation probation-condition sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation statutory-purposes supervised-release
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a standard condition of supervised release which requires a person to 'permit a probation officer to visit [her] at any time at home or elsewhere' too broad to comply with the directive under § 3583(d)(2) that a condition 'involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary'?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1) Is a standard condition of supervised release which requires a person to “permit a probation officer to visit [her] at any time at home or elsewhere” too broad to comply with the directive under § 3583(d)(2) that a condition “involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary” to further the statutory purposes of supervised release? ii PARTIES Petitioner: Antranette Canady Respondent: United States of America

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2020)

Attorneys

Antranette Canady
William Reynolds BiggsWILLIAM R. BIGGS, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent