No. 20-6007
William Harold Wright, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge criminal-indictment criminal-procedure due-process indictment judicial-review prosecutorial-discretion statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-evidence venue
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court err in denying the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ESTIONS) PRESENTED | Did the. Dr wares Court Erect 10 Denne doaht’s Modton bo t SINS Che Naictineit ? _ ee OO | LL SE OF PARTIES | | A-EDCARES Circus Suckes. RELATED CASES : Cours CE Appeals arty GAIEN eC , Sudginen t entered NcNember 22, 2019, _ — UOnrta} States \/. riaht MO. I9ACES ~1 DUS. a os oo. Amended United States V. William Wright, Jr. ; Noe iSB-lIQb TS : : : . Certificate of Interested Persons : ; and
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2020-11-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
William Harold Wright, Jr.
William Harold Wright Jr. — Petitioner
William Harold Wright Jr. — Petitioner