No. 20-6012

Allen Young v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-defect discovery-violations due-process fifth-amendment fourth-amendment indictment-defects insufficient-evidence perjury prosecutorial-misconduct search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : . QUESTIONS x(1) Where the conviction is built on perjury, the prosecution . knew of Head Agent Dana McNeal and alleged victim's faisé testimony ; Bk oath, and prosecution misconduct.. Violated my due process and : Kutzner v. Johnson rule of 18:U.S8.C. § 2516, 3600 or Part 1. crine, _ chapter 79 perjury. That an agent of officer which a law of the United States authorized an oath to be administered, that will testify truly. The Seventh Cirenit says a lie can be justified as long as it is in the Government's interest, or benefits them. ¥ (2) Where the District Court used offensive element I was not indicted on or charged, to prove 18:U.S.C. § 1591 and 1594 commerce and jurisdiction. How can the court have the jury find me guilty of ("entice", 18:U.S.C. § 2422(b)) which I was not indicted or ‘charged with? The Appeal Court switched "entice" to "coerced". to keep from ruling in my favor. . How can the District Court sentence i me under an adult charge that the jury did not find me guiity of? a 9th Circuit says failure to state element of charge offense invoived right and is reviewabie and is a fundamental defect that rendered indictment constitutionally defective. : * (3) When did Congress of Supreme Court give the District Court power to authorize the prosecutor to strike offensive elements from an indictment without resubmission to a grand jury? When is a superceded indictment, unsigned by the Government, OK? When can . the Government amend section and subsection of the statute and make at ambiguous and add sections from all section, and drop offensive element from it? The 10th and 9th Circuit say this makes the —— indictment constitutionally defective and should be void. This also violates the rule in Milier v. United States by broadening : my charges and indictment. . . x (4) How can any court make a defendant go to triai without . receiving any of his Discovery or time to mount a defense? This is a violation of my due process. . y (5) How can 18:U.8.C. § 1594 be proven without the offensive ; ; . element "recruit" or "entice"? How can I be found guiity of ‘Alexis on attempt to "recruit" or "entice"? 5th Amendment due process ciaim that evidence was constitutionally insufficient to ; sustain verdict of guilty. Fiore v. White U.S. 225 (2001).° . Prosecution failed topresent sufficient evidence to prove element ; of crime and therefore petitioner's conviction is not consistent with the demands of the Federal Due Process clause. 18:U.S.C. : § 1591 or 1594, 11th and 5th and 9th Circuit say nothing in 7 18:U.S.C. § 1591 or 1594 lowers the Government's burden of proof; . the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt ali elements ; of the 1591 crime. United States v. Mozic 752 F. 34.1271. 5th : . : and 11th Circuit Appeal, 7th Circuit say Government can pick -one offensive element to prove out of the statute? x (6) Where Agent violated the rule United States v. Infante-Ruiz of search and seizure. How can the First Circuit vacate convietion ; because the sister had neither actual nor apparent authority to consent to search of brother's bags? The Seventh Circuit District Court says it is OK because the landiord had a key; the 7th Circuit . Appeal’ Court wouid not rule on it because Young asked for the : evidence to be suppressed the day he went pro.se. The judge chose a to wait until sidebar at trial to answer the motion. The Appeal Court says the motion was put in too late. Is this not a : violation of my Fourth Amendment right? % (7) Where does defendant's due process right get violated to : fair justice under the law? Fourth Amendment; Supreme Court ruled on the Carpenter case; different judges are using different loopholes not to abide by the court. The courts say the Supreme : Court was not clear and needs to be clear on it's ruling. Some judges gay the ruling does not say if it is retroactive, it does not say if a warrant application is OK. Chief Justice John Roberts said in Carpenter case warra

Docket Entries

2021-08-02
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED.
2020-12-20
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2020)

Attorneys

Allen Young
Allen Young — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent