Kenneth H. Newkirk v. Jeffery Kiser, Warden
Whether the petitioner should be subjected to deliberate indifference to serious medical needs under the Eighth Amendment, even though the petitioner has a civil claim and not a criminal one
No question identified. : WHILE Punsueine Tihs Chote CYT ty , l. HeLa F Have been neteahed Fao TMS oe ANd “WE CUSidy 66 The UA. OeOL 6. ERLE . bRUARRED) THAT JF. peeimety ALLEpCED THIT EAM UNDER Jrmini7 parte of ReCrevint Sépmis PrySical Fr Fury ? oo a A SHOUD TM ME Fie BE SUBTECTEO HH Nhe DEUBERBTE TO Le REE. Aw) Sef Busicge Fey WusT BaCouse JF Have A CwitSay fenomt. AND NOT A Chima pRoleepve. 2 | Nb MATTER LonT Em Filing SHoULg TT rye SALE Orne FAST? _ , Y. SINCE Tie YA CRCYIT LooRT HaS De tegnmneO ON JUL lb. Abd6 THT TL HAT CLees" A PATTERy OF MS GNOUCT EvipenCPt Te LiKE U Yon OF Fnminin T «Shi pHysicae Fuduey" Makin, 319 £.3d 4b 50 —— CHUULONIT ZL be Gwen Bal /Aelegse Penomk Ap pe SC OF TS CnSe ? pprenotk A Page 2, On