No. 20-6028

Carmencita Maria Pedro v. City Fitness, LLC, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-duty due-process equal-protection evidence-fabrication forgery judicial-integrity judicial-misconduct rule-of-law standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

If United States District Court Judges are unable to discern the falsity of forged documents, how can the public have confidence in the federal judiciary?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. If United States District Court Judges are: (a.) unable to “decipher” or discern the falsity, inauthenticity, illegitimacy and invalidity of The FORGERY?! and other forged documents and fabricated evidence due to their physical and/or mental disabilities; or (b.) unwilling to declare The FORGERY and other forged documents and fabricated evidence to be the fakes and phonies that they actually are as an unlawful consequence of their outright misconduct; or (c.) a combination of both scenarios (a.) and (b.), then how can any party or any member of the general public have confidence in the federal judiciary or trust that federal judges are faithfully discharging their solemn duty to equal protection under law pursuant to the Constitution of the United States or believe that federal judges . possess the necessary ability, wherewithal and commitment to afford due process to all and make legally sound evidentiary determinations in all civil actions and criminal cases where they preside with the power to render life and death decisions that affect the rights, liberties, freedoms and property of the parties appearing before them and the general public at large? 2. If United States Courts of Appeals are: (a.) unwilling to declare The FORGERY and other forged documents and fabricated evidence to be the fakes and phonies that they actually are as an unlawful consequence of their outright misconduct; or (b.) unwilling to uphold the integrity and independence of the federal judiciary by enforcing the rule of law and holding United States District Courts and the attorneys and parties who appear before them legally accountable to the law to pursuant to the Constitution of the United States: or (c.) a combination of both scenarios (a.) and (b.) then how can any party or any member of the general public have confidence in the federal judiciary or trust that federal judges are faithfully discharging their solemn duty to equal protection under law or believe that federal judges possess the necessary ability, wherewithal and commitment to afford due process to all and make legally sound evidentiary determinations in all civil actions and criminal cases where they preside with the power to render life and . death decisions that affect the rights, liberties, freedoms and property of the parties appearing before them and the general public at large? 1The FORGERY appears supra at p. 13, and it is also hereby attached hereto, incorporated into and made part hereof, by reference, as though set forth and full herein at

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-25
Waiver of right of respondent City Fitness LLC, et al. to respond filed.
2020-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)

Attorneys

Carmencita M. Pedro
Carmencita Maria Pedro — Petitioner
Carmencita Maria Pedro — Petitioner
City Fitness LLC, et al.
Rufus A JenningsDeasey, Mahoney & Valentini, Ltd., Respondent
Rufus A JenningsDeasey, Mahoney & Valentini, Ltd., Respondent