Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED In the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA), Congress gave the over 19 million military over 800,000 who work for state and local government employers—a cause of action to remedy adverse employment actions taken because of their military service. It enacted USERRA pursuant to its constitutional War Powers, U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cls. 11-16, recognizing that unremedied employment discrimination by state employers based on military service could interfere with the nation’s “ability to provide for a strong national defense.” H.R. Rep. No. 105-448, at 5 (1998). USERRA’s cause of action against state employers may be pursued only in state courts. In a sharply divided decision that conflicts with the Constitution’s text, structure, and history, the court below, a Texas intermediate appellate court with jurisdiction over more than 2 million Texas citizens, held that USERRA’s cause of action is unconstitutional because Congress lacks the power to authorize lawsuits against nonconsenting states pursuant to its War Powers. The question presented is whether Congress has the power to authorize suits against nonconsenting states pursuant to its War Powers. (i)
2023-06-30
Record has been returned.
2022-06-29
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-603_o758.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Sotomayor, Kagan, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Kagan, J., filed a concurring opinion. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, JJ., joined.
2022-03-29
Argued. For petitioner: Andrew T. Tutt, Washington, D. C.; and Christopher G. Michel, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Judd E. Stone, II, Solicitor General, Austin, Tex.
2022-03-18
Reply of petitioner Le Roy Torres filed. (Distributed)
2022-03-18
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.
2022-03-09
Brief amicus curiae of Separation of Powers Clinic at Antonin Scalia Law School filed. (Distributed)
2022-03-09
Brief amicus curiae of Professor Philip A. Pucillo filed. (Distributed)
2022-03-09
Brief amici curiae of State of Montana and 14 Other States filed. (Distributed)
2022-03-03
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
2022-03-02
Brief of respondent Texas Department of Public Safety filed. (Distributed)
2022-02-07
Brief amicus curiae of Bipartisan Members of Congress filed. (Distributed)
2022-02-07
Brief amici curiae of Former Members of Congress filed.
2022-02-07
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.
2022-02-07
Brief amici curiae of Philip C. Bobbitt, Michael C. Dorf, and H. Jefferson Powell filed.
2022-02-07
Brief amici curiae of National Veterans Legal Services Program, et al. filed.
2022-02-07
Brief amicus curiae of Reserve Organization of America filed.
2022-02-07
Brief amici curiae of War Powers Scholars filed.
2022-02-07
Brief amicus curiae of Professor Jeffrey M. Hirsch filed.
2022-02-07
Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Constitutional Law and The Law of Federal and State Courts filed.
2022-02-07
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
2022-01-31
Brief of petitioner Le Roy Torres filed.
2022-01-31
The record received from the Court of Appeals of Texas 13th District is electronic and located on the Court of Appeals of Texas web site. Also one envelope containing the Notice of Appeal, Clerk's Record, and Reporter's Record.
2022-01-28
ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, March 29, 2022.
2022-01-26
Record requested from the Court of Appeals of Texas 13th District.
2022-01-18
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.
2021-12-30
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Le Roy Torres.
2021-12-29
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Le Roy Torres
2021-12-22
Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Texas Department of Public Safety
2021-11-23
Supplemental brief of petitioner Le Roy Torres filed. (Distributed)
2021-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-11-09
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
2021-03-01
The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
2021-02-10
Reply of petitioner Le Roy Torres filed. (Distributed)
2021-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-01-27
Brief of respondent Texas Department of Public Safety in opposition filed.
2020-12-23
Brief amici curiae of Philip C. Bobbitt, Michael C. Dorf, and H. Jefferson Powell filed.
2020-12-23
Brief amicus curiae of Reserve Organization of America filed.
2020-12-23
Brief amicus curiae of Professor Jeffrey M. Hirsch filed.
2020-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 27, 2021.
2020-12-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2020 to January 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-24
Response Requested. (Due December 28, 2020)
2020-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent Texas Department of Public Safety to respond filed.
2020-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)