No. 20-6032

Timothy Nolan v. Kentucky

Lower Court: Kentucky
Docketed: 2020-10-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment human-trafficking jurisdictional-error notice notice-requirement standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it possible to sustain a prosecution for human trafficking when no one is trafficked?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. The requirement to provide notice of what conduct is considered to be human trafficking will forever be changed by the answer to the question: Is it possible to sustain a prosecution for human trafficking when no one is trafficked? The answer will determine if a statute which plainly provides notice for some elements does not constitutionally inform and provide notice to every application government officials deem detestable to forever brand a person as a human trafficker. Il. Timothy Nolan petitions this Honorable Court to hold Kentucky accountable to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment resolving any doubt for the people when an error requested to be deemed clerical is an error of law and the point at which jurisdiction is necessary to make a change rather than a correction of a judgment which has become final.

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-10
Waiver of right of respondent Kentucky to respond filed.
2020-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)

Attorneys

Kentucky
James C. ShackelfordKentucky Attorney General, Respondent
James C. ShackelfordKentucky Attorney General, Respondent
Timothy Nolan
Timothy Nolan — Petitioner
Timothy Nolan — Petitioner