Whether the district court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's claims

No question identified. : yd dhe Court eted MN ore nt cleFendont abled , Tate War Soll orety | bY sid dhe Cou eared nk Yeah weFendant Seto" ayes asus or to ° | | C] au parties appear in the caption of the case on the | Aan Parties do pot appear in the caption of the saa on he cove page. A list of H. Fuaton,Sep:) Robe WocPh ,C-0,)"Yheresa Shale Chod lal PchalPus,OeYe, Suh. Sect y A Boel, DePLSuM. Pesgrttts “eho NuHall, Weel Cort. of Prone Yellen Bornes V Pedele 202 WL 12737028 Bacher v/, Nuttall, 2007 WC E1202 , Rornos v. Fedele, 2009 We 259720 Barnes VV tedele, Zale Wl 410226 Rarnes vturten, 20S Wl 621 &S 34aries V! Fedele YS Fed. APEX 696, B66 WL 278722 eons Vv Fedele, ZV, Wl 42,3929 | cues V. Ledeley 33] E SUR 3d 227 Zald Wh 4AbIT2 Bomex Keeley Ua € Sui 2%, Za Ww Wao SI / United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshail United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 16" day of May, two thousand nineteen. . Arrello Barnes, v. 18-3223 Fedele, et al., M. McGinnis, et al., Defendants. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ira M. Feinberg Hogan Lovells US LLP 390 Madison Avenue : New York, NY 10017 212-918-3509 , be appointed as counsel for the Appellant. Counsel is directed to review Local Rule 31.2 regarding procedures for setting the filing dates for the submission of briefs. For the Court: ; Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court — JURISDICTION [ ] For cases from federal courts: The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case was Sa i No petition for rehearing was timely filed in my case. : [ ] A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of Appeals on the following date; __.__'._...__, and a copy of the order denying rehearing appears at