Whether the lower court erred in its application of the legal standard for determining if a government action constitutes a regulatory taking under the Fifth Amendment

No question identified. : © nuedir beer é e . f 2. LN] j Lie fe of 24042 L405 LACL 24 Zam a) ig LS CRO Oe SALVE, ale 2 LELLE NSO SPH LLLS FLX? SEA FDL] ox Li . r 7 CO a 7 ar (AL 272 We LOLOL BNL. CPF YI~Z PRK A CLE ot . A n ah S-GALZS Ae’ & OO LL) oD ~s+ 2 OF L 1 PUB AOACL Qe = _ Ae! a) O17 22. 2237 I <a LL Qa 579A. Say LELE, P22 PLFA. KOU ZED . ‘ Ce Hee nr Z. , Ly y , e , 4 Khu Cos O77 A, ¢ “2 A MA <2 LEZ EER, LE ’ f t ; yy 7 + Lh SA AL DLL EONS. Ze LLEIS2 J20VE2 £2 uk SD La 25 ; , 7 Téa TALES 2 CS 212 LC IHL Cre POF CAD yn SD eB VN OA cr X72 Like LOCALS #2 ELL ET AS OPES Ce hago .f . . g Z ae P Kot GOCE LF fox] Ze. Fa "a A Llosa : . Lf, 5 7, YA, “ r : e Z arts "Was 2 of the tases IPod gt lec. CoP led a2 pn Laub cot ns? pottbins gre, Les. KS ALG SX MHNELBO Cort Z3 1¥ e— Andes LEZ4 a te : =. : ”. y Ke. 6S PIE pape LGR DE CK2 Seer 2 =n Cevr1 ks 22-7 ‘ 0 , . Z 2 5 ; Sch SE , ao Lo LI 2 23 IKS Nd ol ls fal. al CLLLS OonaSg 7LIC. LO Loc Je CLO PE, ra —_— wey ae 7 — CO2LA DE ry 2oxs Vian LYLE. EA a f 2 oy V4 AGH 47 OQir¥ 377 etn hig LA Zz fio LEQ SCH, Zi C430 UME FB? O27 a7 cre OSALETR DPE. S gl V Og te LQ Ye ore vz eet t:2 2122 CPA Cpl Rane O LMS en Ld LZ OWI Ly Ke KO CorcaaseegSOE nl sh LEZ tte. hed PKR ore Mee Leg Bor OU, Abele Setcel the d lepeiter demderiagg.. Lbys cod : . CACY LL wo 4) 44 ee, a Ses 42 te BONE ZS ; a= SOLZ LL hai L LILLIA Fp, APC pf VOR var LTA : 2 ug re 4 k AE Lor Yr Fe OWSZELMLAGI SG oO ca Zn ZA & YL. 2PAZ fA Ag Mertcly Pe Le ener tee eee penne tanneries ; : ‘ te nen nee ere enney nanan . ane . natty rege ree tere repeater tiie . . Res