Ineffective-Assistance-of-Counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I, Appellate Court erred in denying Petitioner's Ineffective Assistance of Counsel claim. Where prejudice was established, in the trial courts findings that the alibi witnesses credibility carried great weight in his decision, : and the trial court's decision was based partially on evidence not presented. Violating petitioner's 6th Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.of the United States Constitution. II. The Appellate Court erred in denying petitioner's claim that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that David Willard was the shooter, where the sole identification witness's testimony was unreliable oO given his inability to observe the shooter and the rapid sequence of , events and the Appellate Court's failure to consider excepted science on eyewitness identification, and defense alibi witnesses. Violating petitioner's right to due process law under the 5th and 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. . :