Charlie Bell Bullock v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Does the Confrontation Clause require a victim to be made available for cross-examination if pictures of them are submitted, and is counsel ineffective for not objecting to such an occurrence?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED co, a: Dees The Cow Seonto-tion Clause Tequive & Vickm to be | | made available Loe Cross examination if pictures of trem | ave submittea and is counsel iweMlecrive Lox wot objecting to ¢ucw aw occurrenc er , ; ; A. Does the prevailiug professional norm eequive a tviay attormey to kKuow tHe coveect standavd of review? 3, Does the Preva'hing prefessionad Mote tTequice a trial attervney to Kuow the ~e ewe wits ef the o SSensel . AY. Can ow attorneys Cumulative ~ecvors be ineMMective assistance . eo . ; . . . even (OC wae erroy, by ise, was wot.