No. 20-6040

Charlie Bell Bullock v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: capital-punishment confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mitigating-evidence professional-norms sentencing-phase sixth-amendment standard-of-review victim-rights
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Confrontation Clause require a victim to be made available for cross-examination if pictures of them are submitted, and is counsel ineffective for not objecting to such an occurrence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED co, a: Dees The Cow Seonto-tion Clause Tequive & Vickm to be | | made available Loe Cross examination if pictures of trem | ave submittea and is counsel iweMlecrive Lox wot objecting to ¢ucw aw occurrenc er , ; ; A. Does the prevailiug professional norm eequive a tviay attormey to kKuow tHe coveect standavd of review? 3, Does the Preva'hing prefessionad Mote tTequice a trial attervney to Kuow the ~e ewe wits ef the o SSensel . AY. Can ow attorneys Cumulative ~ecvors be ineMMective assistance . eo . ; . . . even (OC wae erroy, by ise, was wot.

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)

Attorneys

Charlie Bell Bullock
Charlie Bell Bullock — Petitioner
Charlie Bell Bullock — Petitioner