Whether the Florida Supreme Court's statutory construction in Hurst v. State constitutes substantive law

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Florida Supreme Court’s statutory construction in Hurst v. State constitutes substantive law, and if so, whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that this substantive law govern the law in existence at the time of Mr. Archer’s alleged offense? 2. Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits State v. Poole to retroactively change Florida’s substantive law to Mr. Archer’s detriment? 3. Whether the Florida Supreme Court’s recession from Hurst v. State in Poole violates the Eighth Amendment as it relates to the jury’s role of finding statutorily required facts beyond a reasonable doubt? 1