Jonathan Ortiz-Torres v. United States
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Should a writ of certiorari should be granted to determine if trial counsel renders ineffective assistance when he fails to advise his client that the government could request a sentence above that recommended in a plea agreement thus rendering the plea involuntary
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Should a writ of certiorari should be granted to determine if trial counsel renders ineffective assistance when he fails to advise his client that the government could request a sentence above that recommended in a plea agreement thus rendering the plea involuntary. Should a writ of certiorari be granted to determine if a plea is constitutionally valid — when the same is entered to an offense the defendant did not commit. Should a writ of certiorari should be granted to determine if counsel renders ineffective assistance by permitting Ortiz-Torres to plead guilty to a Title 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(a) and Title 18 U.S.C. § 924(j) simultaneously on the same charged offense. Should a writ of certiorari be granted to determine if a conviction for a Title 18 U.S.C. § 924(j) must be vacated in light of this court’s decision in Sessions v. Dimaya, 2018 U.S. Lexis 2497 (2018). ii