No. 20-6058

Lacey Renee Baxter Moore, aka Lacey Kittrell v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment criminal-procedure due-process liberty-deprivation probation probation-condition sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation statutory-purposes supervised-release
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-11-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a standard condition of supervised release requiring a person to permit a probation officer to visit at any time at home or elsewhere is too broad to comply with the directive under § 3583(d)(2) that a condition 'involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary'

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1) Is a standard condition of supervised release which requires a person to “permit a probation officer to visit [her] at any time at home or elsewhere” too broad to comply with the directive under § 3583(d)(2) that a condition “involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary” to further the statutory purposes of supervised release? ii PARTIES Petitioner: Lacey Renee Baxter Moore Respondent: United States of America

Docket Entries

2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)

Attorneys

Lacey Moore
William Reynolds BiggsWILLIAM R. BIGGS, PLLC, Petitioner
William Reynolds BiggsWILLIAM R. BIGGS, PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent