Paul Edward Duran v. Kathleen Allison, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Did the Ninth Circuit Court err by not issuing a COA, when the Court had knowledge that there were allegations of constitutional violations that were not refuted with facts in a proper evidentiary hearing in state or federal court?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED oo. . ; WL) Did Ane Ninth Circuit Coot exren by net VsSueing wo COA, when Fhe Court hack Knowledge tet Looe yrone:. of Ne DURAN S olled.g eck Constitutional Miles ions . ove tear Moean vefuted with Pach In groper” aM dentiany hearmng An State of Rederat Count | fe “amd oc So oo _ nere of ws alleged Cons}it vtional Violorbians have ee Meawireds ewrdentieng Weaning ‘A Shete. nore Fedberecl . Court Appeware orecedcly, 5 . ; : 1s Ololigatecd So nogolac ye. Contr noe pee tht ° court . 2* 2) Wh Weve sele : oe © A Comp lect . so oN & Claim of actuall inno + ys | yay a ents 8 brought im a abens Courpus ow wikhertyoarp Ww i” N 4 ; . eO”7 faring Ce quinech Cs Fedberal weve Wh ‘dh fe, a ; “ew as wt lent that S Never affordet ofulland fale we te hes . . Ob LOA : : FT lion Was not Cotan aA \ . acts oF Preach Committed yu “ 7 Weg al Te 90 sh. b ww we wt . q e Jor een mew K Peck hes 1 "ob ‘ ‘ ,