Whether the court allowed the petitioner to represent himself using standby counsel when he had also been appointed assistant counsel, and whether the petitioner's rights were violated when the trial transcripts were not provided

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED oo H)ONGs the Count alowed me fe Kepecsent Mysaf ucing ftial Shevlel L have bso appointed @SsistastCounsel a fran (edenines that Zim heaains te Paice au did yet have my beading dicls Pheoeshevt feiat? 2)£ wish fea the Covet te decide Cleacly whether Ary Public Dehoisie, is dilowed Te assist the DA. afte the judge Kelieved hen ftom hen duties of Ksfessouting me 7% a 3) Please decide whether 2 jueer, Afr Readms enous of an sede in the Ness Papen te Cetlize Thar ts My case of Which he fs feesontty 2 won Sho ke the Covet have dismissed This jo@oa because ef the fhejsdicral naprc of this artrels ? ¢ ; : ee 4A witness Ram 2 -P@ive -eral twenty «ys a@3_ ase was béows bt te Test fy against Me iN the instant case bot the tual thanischifts Werte Net Perided. Did this abssenes of fhe thal tenses vio lare any of my Gchts.? pee pn eee a en ne a ee fa eee eee