No. 20-6065

Delmar Reinheimer v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aedpa antiterrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act collateral-consequences collateral-consequences-of-conviction exhaustion-doctrine failure-to-advise federal-habeas-corpus habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference: 2020-11-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Under the Sixth Amendment and the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), is a claim of ineffective-assistance-of-counsel regarding collateral-consequences-of-conviction sufficiently-similar-to-a-claim-of-failure-to-advise in order to be considered exhausted-for-federal-habeas-corpus-purposes

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED I. Under the Sixth Amendment and the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), is an ineffective assistance of counsel claim of regarding collateral consequences of conviction sufficiently similar to a claim of “failure-to-advise” in order to be considered exhausted for federal habeas corpus purposes? 2

Docket Entries

2020-11-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
2020-10-29
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2020-10-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2020)

Attorneys

Delmar Reinheimer
Valarie LinnenAttorney at Law, Petitioner
Valarie LinnenAttorney at Law, Petitioner
State of Florida
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent