No. 20-6072
Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino v. J. Espinosa, Warden, et al.
IFP
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the state of California have the right to circumvent its own state garnishment laws to impose the garnishment charge of $35 over the $10 fee presented by state law?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1 Does the state of Califernia have the tight te a Cicqumvent its 0" stale gacnishmeat Joes T° iw | , ) ice the arpishmenr chacge PG SAS over td 5 neat aos? oO faa e 3 |loed by stete gam > — PercenTed
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 18, 2020)
Attorneys
Dorothy Maraglino
Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino — Petitioner
Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino — Petitioner