When charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), does the district court retain jurisdiction to charge an offense that is not a 'crime of violence' as required under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)?

No question identified. : QutsTi on(s) PRESENTED _|L_ Wren cHagged with VidLaring 1%.us.c 8 722(4)C) ) Covered with $924(@)(2), des THe “DistrieT CoukT Retain oisdioTipN to CHarge an oF Fensé that isnT __8)_pwariing av ReQuired een ent Oe 2. When charged With ViovaTing 12. u. s.¢ $422@)0) tip wits (pHa M2), Toe t Given’ _ TRue Notice” pF HE Mens Sea is THaT aN — “Fag and” just” Reason vnpek F.td. k CRM) _ QYUAYMG) Pk Guilt Prea agreements To be withDRawn, ___ __... Dut__stp_an_* Constitutional “Invalid” “Plea apreemenT 2 _ 0 eee hist. OF OagRtits N E1BTED CASES a _ RELATED (CASES RELATED CASES ; ena v/. TeD ctaTeS No, [71-9560 u.sS. CovRT pF ApfPeais Fok THE GibventH cicoviT. uD GmesT entered one ZI EO rie OF ConTENTS QURIS DICTION se ceereeuseet oe ee ee ee oe pee eee cee Arg uemMent Deere rt eee ee ewe ee tee ecco es ecto IZ" 2b _ ait OF CITED AuTHOgiTIES eases —_ 139 $.cT 2191 (2019 ) geoee gee ew ee 2 ewe eee 2 eee _ “UNITED states V. InQUeZ Benitez : dQ Y.6 TH+ 93(2004) «oe ee cee oe ne ee i R07) rr v.8. 668, 94 (1984) 22 ee oe oe cc oe om oe oe : lV Leeka —_— TH ous. 52,5 1996 ) ow we 8 eee en oe no ann ee Smith V0 GRADY _ : a 2. U.S 329, 334 CIM!) . +--+ 2 2 eee tere eee ee UNTTED STATES VOLANDO. s—CsSC 5d U.S 725 732 (1993) --crncrceceee ence 2 Beaver V. Massachvsetts$ 137 S.CT, 1999 1907-09 (2017) ,..cnn e oer ere mace 9 UNITED STATES V_JOCKSON 120 F. 122.6, 1229 Citar 1997) sencer coonec Duncan V. LOUISANA. 39] us 145 149 20 Lep yal 9? s.cT 1444 C19GZ) .---eee TrErson V. Newyork 439 y.s 197, 210 638 |) 2d 289i FT §.ct 2319 (1977).-MULLANE _Wilbpuk. 421 v.S 634 694% 95 S.cT ig3iI\i9e ).. ~onnteD STATES V. BucklgS, —sSSSC“( __UNITeD StateS V. BROWN ——SC“‘(C; tT F.3d HT Cit! ck 1991) «22 oe e cere? __ Boy Kin V. ALABAMA a Be F.3d 1093 109% (tin. 199t) ee eee pakke. Adley eae Bh Ua 20, s. 20, 2% ( (1992 ) er