No. 20-6092
Nathan L. Hill v. Warden of Lee County, U. S. P.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: albeyne-v-united-states civil-rights collateral-review constitutional-law due-process statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court's holding in Albeyne v. United States set forth a rule of statutory interpretation that could be used for collateral review
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I) Whether this Court's h olding” in Albeyne. Vv Unvted Stoles, Set foeth a Rule of Stedutony inteepretahon; that could be USEA or Collatceal Leview A) The fowee Coutts nave msinkealy conflated Alleyne'sS Rule of statutony wrteepretahon, ito, the New Rule of Conshtuhonal lacs) Which hag resulted in the statutoug Rule, being Eviscecatedk .
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-05
Waiver of right of respondent Warden of Lee County to respond filed.
2020-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Warden of Lee County
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent