No. 20-6098
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure fairness-integrity-public-reputation intervening-supreme-court-decision judicial-review jury-instructions plain-error plain-error-review substantial-rights supreme-court-decision trial-record
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether plain-error review for failure to instruct on an element of the offense, based upon an intervening U.S. Supreme Court decision, allows courts to review beyond the trial record when analyzing whether the error affected a defendant's substantial rights or impacted the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether plain-error review for failure to instruct on an element of the offense, base upon an intervening U.S. Supreme Court decision, allows courts to review beyond the trial record when analyzing whether the error affected a defendant’s substantial rights or impacted the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the trial.
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-15
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-12-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 20, 2021.
2020-12-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 21, 2020 to January 20, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 21, 2020.
2020-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 20, 2020 to December 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Lamont Owens
David Joseph Guastello — The Guastello Law Firm, LLC, Petitioner
David Joseph Guastello — The Guastello Law Firm, LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent