No. 20-61
Joan Orie Melvin v. Stephen D. Zappala, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment state-crimes workplace-rule workplace-rules
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant's Fifth Amendment rights are violated when charged with state crimes based on alleged deviation from an internal workplace rule rather than the charged offenses
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The question presented is whether a defendant’s rights under the Fifth Amendment as incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment are violated when she is charged and convicted of state crimes based on alleged deviation from a standard contained in an internal workplace rule rather than the charged offenses. i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent Stephen D. Zappala, et al. to respond filed.
2020-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 24, 2020)
Attorneys
Joan Orie Melvin
Patrick Aloysius Casey — Myers Brier & Kelly, LLP, Petitioner
Patrick Aloysius Casey — Myers Brier & Kelly, LLP, Petitioner
Stephen D. Zappala, et al.
Ronald Michael Wabby Jr. — Allegheny County Dist. Atty., Respondent
Ronald Michael Wabby Jr. — Allegheny County Dist. Atty., Respondent