Did the Second Circuit Court of Appeals prematurely dismiss the case without viewing the facts proving violations to Federal Statutes that shows a finance scheme exists which funds operations designed to force bankruptcy of the United States and harm to citizens of the US?

Questions Presented for Review 7 . Under 18 U.S.C. § 371 a conspiracy to defraud the US. The crime is that of two or more persons who conspire to commit an offense against the United | ' States, or to defraud the United States . Questions: : 1. Did the Second Circuit Court of Appeals prematurely dismiss the case without viewing the facts proving violations to Federal Statutes that shows a ; . finance scheme exists which funds operations designed to force bankruptcy of ' the United States and harm to citizens of the US? . _ 2. The court in this case would only see one small portion of the fraud , scheme with the defendants in this case. Harnessing the power of cash flows ; from illegal mortgage financing generates massive amounts of wealth which j is being used to undermine the United States, our system of democracy and the soundness of our constitution. The financial crisis beginning 2008 was a ; , replica of what is happening now due to COVID. I worked in the credit and . housing counseling industry and know how the cash operations work supporting plans to bankrupt the United States. The defendants are part of : larger scale organized crime that caused the housing crisis with help from credit counseling agencies. For the safety and soundness of the citizens of the | United States, our system of democracy and preservation of our constitution, would the Court consider granting the wit and hearing the case to ) ; Page 2 of 38° understand how the cash flows generated from mortgage financing is used in investment fraud, tax evasion, drug and sex trafficking, anti-trust violations, | voter fraud, and civil rights violations in a conspiracy against the United States? 3. Facts will show the actions of Hollice Creek and Michael Kelly were . intentional and with the intention to defraud as they were compensated to help my X-husband hide the true value of our estate which was unbeknownst to me at the time of over $12Trillion dollars. Their purpose was to undermine me and part of a scheme to defraud the US as part of a conspiracy : for which their actions are federal offenses and violations of the laws under: | | e 18U.S.C. § 371 a conspiracy to defraud the US : : j e 18USC 1014 False Statements in overvalue loan and loan applications e 31 USC 3729 False Claims Act : . e 18US.C 1344 Bank Fraud e 18U.S.C, 1843 Wire Fraud | e 18U.58.C 1961-1968 Racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations | « 18USC 1956: Laundering of monetary instruments e 15 USC 1637A(a), 1639(a-h): Truth in Lending and Real Estate | Settlement Procedures Act e 12 USC 2605: Servicing of mortgage loans and administration of : escrow accounts ; ; . Page 3 of 38 e Federal Fair Housing Act Sec. 805(42 U.S.C. 3605) Discrimination in Residential Real Estate-Related Transactions . e 18USC 1028 Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features and information ; : 4. The facts will prove the defendants committed violations of the law to hide the value of the estate owned by my Xhusband Daniel Howland. They presented misleading documents surrounding the real estate transaction and the divorce settlement to hide the true value of the estate at over $12,624,737,335 for which I would have settled in this real estate transaction. . Would the court order financial compensation for 1/2 that amount or f $6,312,268,662 which would have been divided by my X-husband and I if , Mike and Holly presented a true picture and not set out to defraud me and { the Federal Government. : : ;