No. 20-6104
Jacqueline Pidanick v. Paul C. LaRosa, III, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: affidavit child-custody civil-procedure court-fraud declaration due-process in-forma-pauperis poverty pro-se-litigation standing supreme-court-review
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner should be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis
Docket Entries
2021-05-26
Case considered closed.
2021-01-19
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2020-12-30
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-23
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2020-12-14
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 4, 2021, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a).
2020-11-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
2020-11-05
Brief of respondents Paul C. LaRosa, III, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-04-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2020)
Attorneys
Jacqueline Pidanick
Jacqueline Pidanick — Petitioner
Paul C. LaRosa, III, et al.
Robin Lilley Jackson — Senn Legal, LLC, Respondent