Whether the district court erred in denying the defendant's request for a certificate of innocence, when the defendant had pled guilty to 'hostage taking' but the record shows the defendant believed he was pleading guilty to kidnapping and the court promised he could present evidence at sentencing that he was not actually guilty of the charged offense

No question identified. : Ques7ions Pkesssiep Uhea Se denieL. to _issve a ( ertrFiate QF NDE labrlite, ~— hen 2 jJrs pict Cont abvrel — Ph ot “0. veatron_. : irae > “ no 4 Garo Caves the De¥e ahent te Unkn odla sly Sled guilty to “Weehege Taleing when tha Reconel CS to.cthadt Ginbs ali ts Hot the. Coord need thadthe Do¥enolect helseved!he was gus tty oF kidianocng . and the Court Dromisect he Coult Present his evicleue On witness at Serleaci acy is extreme [evel oF 4 vlicm | Taterperence eohich YFectvely lentes both. Ere thanw Sixth AnernLment a ights, a __ does b+ aXfect He Voluters onl) Frperran | Natwe oF oa go Lh, dle 3) Phen the distort Coat oluaing a Role ll heart earl, tells the DiiaDent?" yoo thouckt od were Cleans to KrYranaag 4: vel he that tho Sacks +Hats whats oresertec! ancl Hats how the aaleem ent 4slF is Proven oboe s, the Ceoust$ Clear acknewledamerT of the De Sendaats belive Es alles For nly olea. ring Thon bIF achos Ardaag im Oreceat Cont nunusly Polsre Oto * Hoscbas ¢— Takin as “Krdas oping" Heesdin thet the jo Fenbant belreves heirs there to | plead-te “Knbaa ging’, Ord Fackorina Th the-Yact the Court wes lw ot the. Dee beats Antonented necta disability where he Aas “trodhle achat nhs “ th ings oloes this aYfect the Arswrng Ot Yoloatary, Aatwe oF fhe Qlea © Wy) At the pont the Detedoat cath thet he Undestrod he was Pleading *@ ve {ts Fo krd napping potevactls oo» Het whole a thine You Dead " A ao the Colt abosets alc retion and ack VS an agent 25 the Cov pAKeay i hen the CeusT dw — (eth patent, Convince the DeSenbnt that he Cox »{ oplea b. +p k iolag Oy) 2G Qugve Yeo. to I ve_eateoe Cx gr be alee. to “ Hostege Tabi PE