Whether an accused's Due-Process Rights are violated when all lower courts deny an Evidentiary Hearing on controversial evidence and picture of a pillow, when States own evidence proves petitioner did not use the pillow?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether an accused's Due -Précess Rights are violated when all lower courts deny an Evidentiary Hearing on controversial evidence and picture of a pillow, when States own evidence proves petitioner did not use the pillow? ; Whether an accused's Due Process Rights are violated when State and Federal a. District Courts deny writ of Habeas Corpus without "Findings of Facts" and "Conclusions of Law'' for petitioner to Argue Facts of Law. to have a Full and _ Fair Fundamental Trial. Whether an accused's Constitutional Right to have “Effective Assistance of Counsel is violated when, Counsel fails to meke an investigation into the case, and makes strategic decisions to not hire "Experts" to make Ballastics and Medical findings, when Counsel was made aware of perjury of States only witness before Trial and when Counsel is not versed in the "Technical Subject Matter", instead relies upon States witness and investigation? oe (i)