No. 20-6114

Shong-Ching Tong v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2020-10-23
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: california-procedure civil-procedure court-of-appeal due-process judicial-disqualification judicial-ethics judicial-misconduct standing supreme-court-california
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Supreme Court of California, En Banc, abused its discretion in denying the petitioner's filing

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether Supreme Court of California, En Banc, had abused their positions denying Petitioner’s filing of , 262227, “Petition For Writ of Mandate/Prohibition or Other Appropriate Relief ? (The “Supreme Court of California, En Banc” was “The request for judicial notice is denied. The petition for a writ of mandate/prohibition is denied.” , The “Supreme Court of California, En Banc” had failed to show why Judge Kin, on January 27, 2020, and at the same time, had falsely filed his. “Order Striking Statement of Disqualification”, “Exhibit A Verified Answer of Curtis A. Kin”, and . “Minute Order” after Petitioner had filed” was OK ? and Petitioner’s “Statement of Shong-Ching Tong Challenging Judge Curtis A. Kin, C.C.P. section 170.3 (c)(1), and C.C.P. section 170.1” was being ignored ? “. 2. Whether Supreme Court of California, Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, erred, on 4/15/2020, ordered to transfer to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, for consideration -, when Petitioner’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Order ordering judge Curtis A. Kin to obey “California Code of Judicial Ethics Canon ‘for Supreme Court’s Ruling’ ” ? : 3. Whether “Court of Appeal, State of California, Second Appellate District, Division One”, on “Apr 27, 2020,” Case No. B305454, erred in IT “ORDER” Denying Petitioner’s “B305454” Petition ? 4. Whether Judge Curtis A. Kin (“Judge Kin”), Superior Court of California, County of 2 Los Angeles, had violated Petitioner Shong-Ching Tong’s (“Petitioner”) Filing of “January 22, 2020, Statement of Shong-Ching Tong Challenging Judge Curtis A. Kin, C.C.P. section 170.3 (c)(1) and C.C.P. section 170.1" ? 5. Whether Judge Kin, on January 27, 2020, had.violated California Code of Judicial Ethics (Canons) (Cal. Rule of Ct., Code Jud. Ethics) ? 6. Whether Judge Kin, on January 27, 2020, and at the same time, had falsely filed his “Order Striking Statement of Disqualification”, “Exhibit A Verified Answer of Curtis A. Kin”, and “Minute Order” after Petitioner had filed “Statement of Shong-Ching Tong Challenging Judge Curtis A. Kin, C.C.P. section 170.3 (c)(1), and C.C.P. section 170.1” ? 3

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-10-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2020)

Attorneys

Shong-Ching Tong
Shong-Ching Tong — Petitioner