Ineffective assistance of counsel prejudiced the petitioner, creating a miscarriage of justice

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did Trial Counsel's serial ineffectiveness prejudice Petitioner, creating a i } miscarriage of justice, that demands his conviction be vacated? oe pid the harmful procedural and statutory errors committed during the legal : proceedings against Petitioner violate his constitutional Due Process and Equal Rights, that demands his conviction be vacated? . : Was Petitioner's Guilty Plea illegally induced, rending the plea invalid, demanding that Petitioner's Plea Agreement be invalidated and vacated? ; Was Petitioner victimized by layered ineffective assistance of counsel, ~ that demands his conviction be vacated? ; a Did the District Attorney's Office Of Philadelphia County commit misconduct ; violating Petitioner's constitutionally protected State and Federal Rights, that demands his conviction be vacated? _ : : Did the Judicial abuse of discretion, harmful errors, personal prejudice — _ and bias during the legal proceedings, violating Petitioner's. Due Process, ; wrongfully convicting an innocent man and invoking an excessive sentence; oo : create a miscarriage that demands Petitioner's conviction be vacated? . Does Petitioner's claims of Actual Innocence negate ALL waivers and issues of ‘untimeliness?