No. 20-6119

In Re Nira Woods

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-10-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion amendment-violation civil-rights constitutional-rights court-reporter due-process equal-protection judicial-recusal recusal standing superior-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Were Petitioner's Constitutional Rights violated (including the 15+, 5th, and 14th Amendment(s))

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Three Orders by three Judges, at three different Superior Court branches in California, without hearing Petitioner (on 09/28/20, 09/30/20, 10/30/20), agree/believe that preserving the employment status of an assigned Court Reporter, over the Petitioner’s Constitutional Rights “would farther the interest of justice”; and therefore ruled/ordered: “The [Superior] Court recuses itself on this case”. [Bold Highlight] And without Qualification, in bias, in abuse of discretion, threw Petitioner out from entire Superior Court of California; the Court Reporter is defendant (20) in Petitioner's Superior Court Case: 20TRCV00564; Question 1: Were Petitioner’s Constitutional Rights violated (including the 15+, 5th, _ and 14th Amendment(s))? Question 2: . “The [Superior] Court recuses itself on this case”, while not ; the case to the California Federal Court, is in violation of Petitioner’s Constitutional Rights?

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-03
Third Supplemental brief of petitioner Nira Woods filed. (Distributed)
2020-11-30
Second Supplemental brief of petitioner Nira Woods filed. (Distributed)
2020-11-19
Supplemental brief of petitioner Nira Woods filed.
2020-10-15
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2020)

Attorneys

Nira Woods
Nira Woods — Petitioner
Nira Woods — Petitioner