No. 20-6123
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment racketeering stolen-property
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-12-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether possession of an item that is one or more transactions removed from an alleged theft constitutes possession of stolen property
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether —in acase involving a racketeering charge based on predicate incidents for “dealing in stolen property” — possession of an item that is one or more transactions removed from an alleged theft constitutes possession of stolen property (and if not, whether such a conviction violates the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution). il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii
Docket Entries
2020-12-14
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
2020-11-23
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2020-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2020)
Attorneys
Dale Holcombe
Crystal Yvette McBee — The Frusciante Law Firm, Petitioner
Florida
Wesley Heidt — Respondent