No. 20-613

Lyle Mark Coultas v. Carroll Tichenor, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Yamhill County Prosecutor, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: circuit-court-review civil-rights due-process due-process-violation fabricated-facts fraud-on-the-court judicial-fraud judicial-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct standing supreme-court supreme-court-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals disregard the United States District Court Judge Marco Hernandez intentional fabrication of facts and law as he clearly did in his decision, and did Judge Marco Hernandez fraud on the court by doing so?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , 1 Can the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals disregard the United States District Court Judge Marco Hernandez intentional fabrication of facts and law as he clearly did in his decision, and . did Judge Marco Hernandez fraud on the court by doing so? ; 2 Does the United States Supreme Court have the legal authority to void a-circuit court conviction that is obtained by intentional fraud on the court? 3 When a Citizen of the United States of America is the victim of fraud on the court by the : County Prosecutor and a State police crime lab detective, then the fraud is concealed by the County Circuit Court the District Court and then the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, how does the United , States Supreme Court correct this fraud on the court? 4 : ~ 4 Can a Circuit Court Judge or a District Court Judge fabricate facts that do not exist and base a sae € dismissal of that case based on the fabricated facts? oS 2 .

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-12-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-10
Waiver of right of respondent Carroll Tichenor, et al. to respond filed.
2020-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)

Attorneys

Carroll Tichenor, et al.
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Lyle Mark Coultas
Lyle Mark Coultas — Petitioner
Lyle Mark Coultas — Petitioner