No. 20-6133
Theodore David Newcomb v. United States
Tags: categorical-approach conspiracy conspiracy-elements controlled-substance controlled-substance-offense eighth-circuit inchoate-offense sentencing-commission statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Sentencing Commission exceeded its authority
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED (1) Whether the United States Sentencing Commission exceeded its authority by adding inchoate and precursor offenses to the definition of “controlled substance offense” through the Guideline commentary? (2) Whether the Eighth Circuit misapplied the categorical approach by finding that the underlying offense of a conspiracy is an element because the coconspirators had to agree on the object of the conspiracy?
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2020)
Attorneys
Theodore Newcomb
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent