Whether appellant's waiver of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ll. Whether. aPfellants waver o¢ his rights under Miranda v. Arizona and te Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments was not Knowing, teiigent, and Voluntary where the defective vsed He Jered eS ch lateived attNant and whet ef arectives Psychologi ons MMi 2La+GH % , “Fed coercion in the form of invojyung o and implied lenvency rende the Con€ession VU aS, ra é ; “ yy Auendiy C within ye meaning of the Fifth and Fourteenth C.Whepler ablevams 1544 +o Personal avtonomy under the SX Ain endinent, YN coy V. Lovisiang C2016).v.5, C206 L-Ed, €21, 13 $ 8.c# God) and FeoPle \ Eddy C2a14) 33 CalAPP.o4 492) was Violated when Fria Coomsel Concéded Syi|t+ in Closing avgument as to Count 1 without aMellan}'s EXbress Conse